memorise | 13 comments | comment
fringe element (2)
AKA omphaloskepsis, rambling anecdotes, fandom, laundry, and random haircuts...
05 April 2008 @ 22:50
( Thinky Doctor Who Thoughts - 4.01 spoilers, and vague spoilers for all of TW and SJA )
04 February 2008 @ 09:54
Not the usual puff piece, as a South African article discusses the potential of fan fiction to improve youth literacy.
I think that is actually AWESOME. Speaking as someone who has long pushed the idea of comics as improving literacy at skeptical parents as a way of getting their kid to read (and read for pleasure), I like the non-judgemental approach at seeing how fan culture can positively affect a broader cultural base. Wish the 4th estate took this route a little more often, instead of going for the sensationalism...
I think that is actually AWESOME. Speaking as someone who has long pushed the idea of comics as improving literacy at skeptical parents as a way of getting their kid to read (and read for pleasure), I like the non-judgemental approach at seeing how fan culture can positively affect a broader cultural base. Wish the 4th estate took this route a little more often, instead of going for the sensationalism...
11 April 2006 @ 14:02
There's been a lot of talk on
time_and_chips about what's going to happen once Rose leaves.
(Which is not a spoiler, folks. It's just a fact.)
Here's the thing: Companions leave.
I think that it's always hard when your first companion leaves. Just as hard, in some cases, as losing your first incarnation of the Doctor. But that's the nature of Doctor Who. Companions leave. Some die, some marry, some get fed up of the constant death, some get stranded in alternate dimensions. Some are left behind to start their lives over. But the fact is: companions leave. Change is your constant. And we'll miss them (well, some of them), but we'll love the new ones that come along, too. After all, I started off with Romana and Adric and Tegan and Nyssa, etc. etc. But that doesn't mean I love them MORE than Rose and Jack and Mickey just because they were there first. (In fact, you don't want to get me started on Adric and Nyssa. You really don't.) And yes, your first companion is special because he or she is your first, the same way your first Doctor is special cos he was your first. No-one is saying they weren't special. Or that you're wrong to grieve. But that's not the same as saying no-one else can be as special, in a different way. Who knows? There could be a decade or more of wonderful companions in store for us. On this series, people change. It's just built into the concept.
Now, yes, people who are solely Rose fans and possibly only in it for the Rose & Doctor relationship (however you perceive that to be--be it romantic or filial) may leave. And that's fair. If that's their only draw and the only reason they're emotionally invested in the programme, it's understandable that they'd perhaps not want to stay once the show they fell in love with evolved into a different dynamic with different castmembers. Speaking as someone who adored first season of Angel, but really only vaguely liked the series it later became through a complete cast change and retooling of the premise, I can understand that. It's not that the other Angel series was necessarily a bad series. In some ways, it was better. It was certainly better crafted, and had some excellent actors, and it had a lot going for it. But it wasn't the a hardboiled noir detective show with a quirky sense of humour about a vampire, a demon, and a prom queen I had fallen in love with, had lost my head and my heart to, and mourned when every trace of it vanished completely.
So for some folks, I can see why, if they signed on for The (Possibly Romantic) Adventures of the Doctor and Rose wouldn't feel the same about The Adventures of the Doctor And Other People. But that doesn't mean they might not fall in love all over again with The Adventures of the Doctor And Other People. Let's not discount the possibility, k? Have a tiny bit of faith that the same team of people might actually bring you more characters you love, played by excellent actors, and just as well written, and you might just lose your head and heart over it as much or more than the show you first fell in love with.
Rose and Jack and Mickey and Jackie are just the beginning. Not an ending. And different isn't always bad. It can be just as good. It can even be better. But let's not throw out the baby with the bath water 18 months before we have to.
ETA:
susanmgarrett told me at Gally this year that (paraphrasing here) the Doctor is Peter Pan, and Wendy always goes back to the nursery and grows up, and he always comes back and takes her daughter. Because that's who he is. And Wendy lets him, because that's who she is. And it doesn't mean she doesn't ever regret her choices. But it is just the way things are. And I think that's an excellent comparison.
Also, I personally think of the TARDIS as Tink. But that's just me.
(Which is not a spoiler, folks. It's just a fact.)
Here's the thing: Companions leave.
I think that it's always hard when your first companion leaves. Just as hard, in some cases, as losing your first incarnation of the Doctor. But that's the nature of Doctor Who. Companions leave. Some die, some marry, some get fed up of the constant death, some get stranded in alternate dimensions. Some are left behind to start their lives over. But the fact is: companions leave. Change is your constant. And we'll miss them (well, some of them), but we'll love the new ones that come along, too. After all, I started off with Romana and Adric and Tegan and Nyssa, etc. etc. But that doesn't mean I love them MORE than Rose and Jack and Mickey just because they were there first. (In fact, you don't want to get me started on Adric and Nyssa. You really don't.) And yes, your first companion is special because he or she is your first, the same way your first Doctor is special cos he was your first. No-one is saying they weren't special. Or that you're wrong to grieve. But that's not the same as saying no-one else can be as special, in a different way. Who knows? There could be a decade or more of wonderful companions in store for us. On this series, people change. It's just built into the concept.
Now, yes, people who are solely Rose fans and possibly only in it for the Rose & Doctor relationship (however you perceive that to be--be it romantic or filial) may leave. And that's fair. If that's their only draw and the only reason they're emotionally invested in the programme, it's understandable that they'd perhaps not want to stay once the show they fell in love with evolved into a different dynamic with different castmembers. Speaking as someone who adored first season of Angel, but really only vaguely liked the series it later became through a complete cast change and retooling of the premise, I can understand that. It's not that the other Angel series was necessarily a bad series. In some ways, it was better. It was certainly better crafted, and had some excellent actors, and it had a lot going for it. But it wasn't the a hardboiled noir detective show with a quirky sense of humour about a vampire, a demon, and a prom queen I had fallen in love with, had lost my head and my heart to, and mourned when every trace of it vanished completely.
So for some folks, I can see why, if they signed on for The (Possibly Romantic) Adventures of the Doctor and Rose wouldn't feel the same about The Adventures of the Doctor And Other People. But that doesn't mean they might not fall in love all over again with The Adventures of the Doctor And Other People. Let's not discount the possibility, k? Have a tiny bit of faith that the same team of people might actually bring you more characters you love, played by excellent actors, and just as well written, and you might just lose your head and heart over it as much or more than the show you first fell in love with.
Rose and Jack and Mickey and Jackie are just the beginning. Not an ending. And different isn't always bad. It can be just as good. It can even be better. But let's not throw out the baby with the bath water 18 months before we have to.
ETA:
Also, I personally think of the TARDIS as Tink. But that's just me.
15 January 2006 @ 01:00
So I was responding to
musesfool's nifty keen post about how she intereacts with fiction fannishly, and how she identifies herself as a 'shipper, and it got me thinking.
( not very well organised meta type fannish thoughts at 1am )
( not very well organised meta type fannish thoughts at 1am )
19 November 2005 @ 13:58
Okay, I am on the second cuppa of the morning (afternoon--whatever), and have just spent an hour getting caught up on my flist in the wake of the Doctor Who CIN scene.
( Okay, here's the thing... )
( Okay, here's the thing... )
30 May 2005 @ 23:12
la la foils and characterisation la la
Had a thought while responding to an LJ comment. Thought I'd share.
( chock full of spoilers for Doctor Who up to ep 10 )
( chock full of spoilers for Doctor Who up to ep 10 )
mood:
contemplative
contemplative17 May 2005 @ 16:42
not quite a thinky but still slightly thinky "Doctor Who" fandom essay
So, I've been working on this rant-cum-essay on and off all, and I've been a bit on the squirrelly side, regarding posting it... But I figure what the hell.
( rant-cum-essay about the doctor/rose fanfic world )
( rant-cum-essay about the doctor/rose fanfic world )
mood:
depressed
depressed23 April 2005 @ 22:39
Gallifrey Go BOOM
So
amchau has the pokey-stick out.
I'm gonna state up front that my knowledge of canon is limited to the aired episodes. I know bugger-all about fanon sources such as the novels or audio adventures. So this is based on my (somewhat limited by time and fuzzy recollection) knowledge of the series alone (which includes most of Three, all of Four, most of Five, parts of Six, vague rumours about Seven, and Eight on video tape somewhere in my basement).
( Gallifrey go BOOM (and should stay went BOOM) )
I'm gonna state up front that my knowledge of canon is limited to the aired episodes. I know bugger-all about fanon sources such as the novels or audio adventures. So this is based on my (somewhat limited by time and fuzzy recollection) knowledge of the series alone (which includes most of Three, all of Four, most of Five, parts of Six, vague rumours about Seven, and Eight on video tape somewhere in my basement).
( Gallifrey go BOOM (and should stay went BOOM) )
mood:
quixotic
quixotic16 February 2004 @ 15:02
Okay: I have a meta-type question for y'all. It actually began as a thought I had on a thread in TWoP, but it's not exactly show-specific...
Do you think that, as women in fandom, we ever judge female characters (particularly the love interests of popular characters) differently or more harshly than we would their male counterparts?
Do you think that, as women in fandom, we ever judge female characters (particularly the love interests of popular characters) differently or more harshly than we would their male counterparts?
mood:
curious
curious30 June 2003 @ 16:15
my two crazy kids...
Okay, I've been talking about this a lot lately, so I thought I'd put some of it down here, explaining myself a bit...
( Simon/Kaylee and The Message )
( Simon/Kaylee and The Message )